<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: rsync 3.0 looking very promising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patternbuffer.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/rsync-30-looking-very-promising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patternbuffer.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/rsync-30-looking-very-promising/</link>
	<description>Kyle Crawford</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:53:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rsync 3 report update &#171; Pattern Buffer:</title>
		<link>http://patternbuffer.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/rsync-30-looking-very-promising/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>rsync 3 report update &#171; Pattern Buffer:</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 03:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patternbuffer.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/rsync-30-looking-very-promising/#comment-50</guid>
		<description>[...]   I&#8217;ve posted about my rsync experiences in the past.  And results of a prerelease of rsync 3. Anyway I&#8217;ve been doing some testing with the final release versions of rsync [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]   I&#8217;ve posted about my rsync experiences in the past.  And results of a prerelease of rsync 3. Anyway I&#8217;ve been doing some testing with the final release versions of rsync [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Resource Forks Suck &#124; Robert Accettura&#8217;s Fun With Wordage</title>
		<link>http://patternbuffer.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/rsync-30-looking-very-promising/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Resource Forks Suck &#124; Robert Accettura&#8217;s Fun With Wordage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 22:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patternbuffer.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/rsync-30-looking-very-promising/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>[...] since rsync 3.0 looks like it will be a lot better, make it a high profile download for Mac OS X 10.4 and 10.5 similar to what was done to push Safari [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] since rsync 3.0 looks like it will be a lot better, make it a high profile download for Mac OS X 10.4 and 10.5 similar to what was done to push Safari [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Using rsync with extended attributes &#171; UNIX Administratosphere</title>
		<link>http://patternbuffer.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/rsync-30-looking-very-promising/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Using rsync with extended attributes &#171; UNIX Administratosphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 10:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patternbuffer.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/rsync-30-looking-very-promising/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>[...] such as the Finder data and resource forks from MacOS X. Kyle Crawford has done an excellent write-up on the state of MacOS X extended attributes support in rsync 3.0.0-pre7 (a prerelease of 3.0), and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] such as the Finder data and resource forks from MacOS X. Kyle Crawford has done an excellent write-up on the state of MacOS X extended attributes support in rsync 3.0.0-pre7 (a prerelease of 3.0), and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
